Friday, December 31, 2010

2011 MLB Futures - Chicago Cubs

Chicago Cubs

Current Odds to Win World Series: 35/1

Last Year:

The Cubs finished 75-87 last year, 16 games behind the Reds in the NL Central. Their pythagorean record, however, was 72-90.


The Good:

The Cubs have a quite a few above average players. They have made some nice additions - signing Carlos Pena and Kerry Wood, while discarding useless or underperforming players - since the middle of last year. Aramis Ramirez had an unexpectedly terrible first half last year and rebounded quite well in the second half. A full season of his expected work would add several wins to last year's total. The rotation and bullpen have live arms with breakout potential, though many of those guys have already performed well. The farm system does not feature many stud prospects, but there are several guys in the upper minors who would provide depth. And the Cubs always will have money to spend if they are in contention - despite what people say about the Cubs having empty pockets these days.

The Bad:

These are the Cubs. They haven't won a World Series in over 600 years. Though that is immaterial, the fan base and the constant potential for meltdowns from the players is not. One bad start from Zambrano or Dempster and fans are calling for their heads. More importantly, the Cubs lack star players. While Soto, Ramirez and even Pena have significant upsides, none are certain. And while the rotation features 5 guys who are legitimate major leaguers, none are likely to have a spectacular ERA. Jeff Samardzija remains the gift that keeps on giving. He is awful, yet the Cubs refuse to give up on him due to his previous receipt of the most ridiculous signing bonus in MLB draft history.

Prognosis:

The Cubs remain a dangerous team. It's hard to imagine last year going any worse for the Cubs, and they still should have won 72 games. But at 35/1, I would like more certainty than projection, especially considering that right now 3 teams are ahead of them in the division. They are worth keeping an eye on over the next couple months, but I think 35/1 is a bit too much to bet on the Cubs.

Labels: ,

2011 MLB Futures - Houston Astros

Houston Astros

Current Odds to Win World Series: 75/1

Last Year:

The Astros finished last year with a 76-86 record, 15 games behind the Reds in the NL Central. However, the record does not reflect their performance, as they finished 8 games above their pythagorean record. This was a 68-win team last year.

The Good:

If Brett Myers and Wandy Rodriguez repeat last season's effort, Astros top prospect Jordan Lyles breaks through, and the remaining filler in the rotation plays constant, the Astros could have an above average rotation. Former highly regarded prospects Brett Wallace (1B) and Jason Castro (Catcher) could have breakout seasons.

The Bad:

The bad news is that there is not much good, and the good is a major, even doubtful, if. The offense was downright bad last year, and the only addition to the 2011 lineup so far is Bill Hall. Myers has been maddeningly inconsistent, and Wallace and Castro were awful in the big league debuts last year. Even if all the breakouts happen, there is precious little talent on the infield and a generally unimpressive outfield. The farm system remains one of the worst in baseball and offers almost no help for the 2011 team. The NL Central's top may not be as high as other divisions, but there are 4 teams ahead of the Astros. Worse yet, the Astros have the following interleague schedule: Rangers - 6 games, Tampa - 3 games, and Red Sox - 3 games.

Prognosis:

Don't be fooled by the 76 wins last year. This was and is a terrible team. At 75/1, the odds are nowhere near where they should be for a team with so little upside. I would need at least 150/1 to consider the Astros. Don't touch.

Labels: ,

2011 MLB Futures Gambling - The Pittsburgh Pirates

As I have done in various forms in previous years, I thought it would be a good idea to provide the blog with some gambling previews for MLB Futures. As I have said many times before, I believe MLB Futures are the single best sports bet to make. The reason is because of two main factors: (1) baseball is still a largely misunderstood game and (2) the playoff structure of MLB renders all teams that make the playoffs equal - as very, very close to 8/1 odds of winning the world series each. Because I believe the best time to place a futures bet is before March 1, I plan to provide a preview of each team over the next two months.

I figured we should start this process with the consensus worst team in the league last year.

The Pittsburgh Pirates

Current Odds to Win World Series: 150/1

The Pirates enter the year as the team with the worst odds of winning the world series. Let's take a look at whether this team is worthy of any sort of gambling consideration.

Last Year:

The Pirates finished last year with a 57-105 record, last place in the NL Central and 20-30 games back of each of the 3 teams I believe will be the most competitive in the division this year. Worse yet, the team's record actually surpassed its performance. The Pirates should have been 52-110 last year based on the stats.

The Good:

The Pirates have a pretty good farm system. After years and years of spinning their wheels in player development, I believe the Pirates system is starting to turn the corner. Outside of the Brewers, no team in the division has made major improvements this offseason. The Pirates figure to have a good bullpen led by Evan Meek and Joel Hanrahan. Andrew McCutchen had a legitimately impressive season last year, and Neil Walker looks to be an above average second baseman for years to come.

The Bad:

The farm system is years away from producing much MLB talent. Most of the highest ceiling players will be no higher than low single-a this season. The staff is led by James McDonald, who though underrated is far from an ace. There is precious little breakout potential from the MLB roster outside of Pedro Alvarez. Its hard to imagine that none of the 3 teams at the top of the division will be good, meaning the Pirates have little chance of sneaking into the playoffs with a bad record. And the wild card never goes to a team with a subpar record.

Prognosis:

Don't go near this bet. As tempting as 150/1 odds may be, teams like this just don't come out of nowhere to win the world series. Years and years of bad drafting and player development have destroyed the franchise, and the Pirates remain several years away from being legitimate contenders. With no immediate breakout potential, the Pirates would need at least 250/1 odds for me to take notice.

Labels: ,

Monday, December 27, 2010

Giants @ Packers Game Recap

Just what the doctor ordered. Sunday's game was a playoff game during the regular season if there ever was one. All the Giants needed to do was win and punch their ticket to the playoffs. They still had a strong shot at the NFC East. The Packers needed to win their last two to make it. Nothing much needs to be said about the game - the Packers kicked the Giants' asses up and down the field.

The Giants played like a bunch of bitches out there.

There's not much to recap about the game itself. If you'd like a recap, go watch footage of the Ken Norton/Gary Coleman fight from Dirty Work. Yesterday's game was a reenactment.

Observations

1. The following players have considerable swag
- QB Aaron Rodgers. Anytime you're able to poke fun at suffering two debilitating injuries this season by signaling you were 'safe' after a slide, you're just swinging your pedestrian-yet-potent Caucasian pecker at the opposition. He had a near-flawless game, doing pretty much everything asked of him. As long as Rodgers remains healthy, the Packers should be considered contenders in every game they play, including the Super Bowl.
- NT BJ Raji. This motherfucker has 6.5 sacks on the year and is a shoo-in for the Pro Bowl, as is sack celebration from Sunday might indicate. With all of the injuries incurred on defense this season, his stable presence cannot be overstated.
- CB Charles Woodson and Omnipotent Creator Clay Fucking Matthews. Each activated their swag boost by causing key fumbles yesterday. I think Clay made a few mental errors yesterday, but his hustle on the Jacobs fumble more than made up for it. I expect that all four of the guys listed so far will be going to Hawaii.
- LB Desmond Bishop. Complete heads-up play to bat the ball back into the field of play behind his back on the Jacobs fumble. He has stepped in very capably in the wake of all of the injuries to the LB core. Should certainly compete for a starting spot next year.
- LT Chad Clifton. Much like he did against Jared Allen earlier in the year, Clifton was on an island against Osi Umenyiora and Jason Pierre-Paul, allowing the line to help swag-deficient RT Bryan Bulaga double Justin Tuck. Osi and JPP combined for 2 solo and 2 assisted tackles on the day.
- RB John Kuhn. Cult hero and conversion machine. He may not have the ups of LeGarrette Blount, but he's been leaping his way into the hearts of the Green Bay faithful for weeks now.


Eat it, Carl Lewis

2. The Packers should fear nobody in the postseason. Grant and Finley would be really nice right now, but it looks as though the Packers are finally able to use Kuhn effectively enough to open things up on the goal line. I expect the Packers to beat Chicago on Sunday, and will be rooting for the Falcons and Buccaneers the next two weeks in hopes of getting the five seed, earning the right to play the NFC west winner. I'd say there's about a 10% chance of that happening, but hey, that's better than nothing.

3. The coaching vacancies are lining up such that it may be tough for Capers to find a head coaching gig despite the abundance of opportunities. He won't get hired in Carolina or Houston, both of whom will have vacancies. It's entirely possible that Leslie Frazier and Jason Garrett retain their current positions. Jon Gruden, Bill Cowher, John Fox, and Jim Harbaugh should all be more attractive choices than Capers. That leaves maybe one or two openings for Capers to vie for, favorable odds for Packer fans. I obviously wish him nothing but the best, but we packer fans deserve a good deal of selfishness right now.

Labels: ,

Monday, December 20, 2010

The Greinke Deal

I finally have a computer again folks. Let's see if we can't get back into the swing of blogging. And what better way to start than by dissecting the Greinke trade - one that for better or worse will be remembered for a very long time here in Milwaukee.

The consensus seems to be that the Brewers made a good trade in acquiring Zack Greinke from the Royals in exchange for Jake Odorizzi, Jeremy Jeffress, Alcides Escobar and Lorenzo Cain. I would like to confirm that belief for you all by stressing two main concepts: (1) the premium of star-level players and (2) competitive windows.

The recent transactions by the Boston Red Sox, and I suppose you could say their entire management technique the past several seasons, shows what good teams need to do to win. First, you must develop home-grown talent to get some star players and depth to fill voids. Then you should spend all resources available to obtain other star players. A team should not throw money around on the free agent market to acquire talent that 25 other teams fill with a guy making $400,000 a season. The point here is that star-level talent is what separates contenders from bad teams. It is damn hard to find, damn hard to keep, and for a team like the Brewers, utterly impossible to acquire in free agency. Its all about supply and demand. Zack Greinke is without a doubt a star player. Yes, he did not have his best season last year. But a disappointing season from him probably would have been good for a 3.50 ERA in the NL Central. And his 2009 season would have been good for a 1.80 season in the NL Central. There wasn't an injury last year, and there is not a real worry about Greinke declining. He is a star player.

The supply of Zack Greinke type players is at most 10. There was one similar player on the free agent market this offseason - Cliff Lee. Lee made four times more than what the Brewers are committed to with Greinke, albeit for a few more years. The supply of Zack Greinkes is exceptionally low. Meanwhile, the demand for him could not be higher. All 30 teams would take Greinke for the money he is making - $13.5 per year. In a pure economic setting not riddled with nonsensical historic contracts, Greinke would earn $30M per season.

For as much as I love prospects and how valuable they are over their 6.5 seasons of early career slavery, I don't share the same sentiments for any of the Brewers players trade away here as I do for Greinke. These guys are not stars. I never imagined Escobar as a star player, and for all his hype, he was one of the worst players in baseball last season. To expect him to become a star player within the next five years is wishful thinking. The guy can't hit. His defense took a step back this year, and I expect if he ever put on the weight needed to be a legitimate MLB hitter, he'd sacrifice a good portion of the one thing making him a major leaguer - his defense. I just don't see him becoming anything more than a good, not great player, and that's if he progresses significantly. There are 40 other guys like him right now. Even if he progresses, I'd say at his peak there are still 10 guys in the league who could replicate his performance. Meanwhile, there are only 30 shortstops who start in MLB. So, demand is not all that high for a guy like Escobar. If he hit the free agent market at his peak, he probably wouldn't make 1/3 of what Greinke would make. And I know the Brewers would have Escobar for 5 years as opposed to 2 for Greinke, but do you honestly think Escobar is going to be a major asset before 2013? Again, that's if he ever develops, which I'm not optimistic he will.

Everything about Escobar can be said about Lorenzo Cain. I applaud his bounce back last season. He had a great season. But he plays a more offensive minded position than Escobar. And there are a lot of really good CFs in the game. Cain may turn into a nice CF, but it's really hard to imagine him being a star. When contracts are handed out to CFs, it's the guys who can hit home runs and do everything that Cain does who get the premium money. Cain's ceiling just isn't that high because he won't have power. So, again, he is replaceable. Star players are not replaceable.

Jeffress and Odorizzi are a bit different in that they are pitchers, so the demand for them is considerable higher. But Jeffress's ceiling is as a good, not great, closer. And Odorizzi is barely a top-50 pitching prospect. While I like him more than most, the reality is that he's unlikely to ever be an impact player in MLB. Far less likely is he to be a star. And as I've repeated over and over, it's the star players that you need to contend because average players can be acquired so easily internally or through free agency.

Realizing that the Brewers traded quantity to get quality, the key to this trade ultimately is the Brewers' competitive window.

The Brewers now have a legitimate chance to win something in 2011 and a slight chance to win in 2012. Without Greinke, they would have had less than a 10% chance in 2011 and less than 5% in 2012 in my opinion. Greinke has pushed those odds upwards of 33% for 2011. Though that may seem small (and you're welcome to disagree), the reality is it is high enough to make an impact, and it is probably almost 4 times more likely that they compete this year with Greinke than without him. But what does this mean for 2013 and beyond? Well, the Brewers are fucked. Like, historically fucked. They have the worst farm system I can recall in my approximately 15 years of following farm systems. They have only two good players under contract for 2013 and probably 15 roster spots to fill with no hope of doing it through the minor leagues. I would be surprised if they didn't lose over 100 games at least once between 2013 and 2015.

But the key here is that Escobar, Jeffress, Odorizzi and Cain would not make a single bit of difference in those seasons. The Brewers already have a terrible farm system (which I would argue was easily the worst in baseball before this trade). So, what good does keeping them around do? The window is open. It will be open for 1 or maybe 2 years. And it will then slam closed. Very hard. There is no point in keeping 4 mid-level talents around to help the Brewers win 66 games in 2014. Why bother?

And with the window so clearly closing, it seems imminent that the Brewers will rebuild rather than try to compete after the next two seasons. I welcome this as much as I welcome the competitiveness I now expect for 2011. The Brewers may have 15 first round and supplemental first round picks in the next 3 years. That is an awfully good way to start the process of rebuilding. Add to that the fact that they will have almost $60M in annual salary off the books by then. That's a lot of money available to draft and sign the best players available. Hell, they could even sign an international player or two. The clean break from competition to rebuilding will be a great opportunity. And, even assuming the worst, that the Brewers are not in competition this year and everything falls apart, they can start trading away and rebuilding right there. Because they have so many quality chips in demand from other teams, they could accelerate the rebuilding if things went wrong.

The Brewers should have won 76 games last year. The Reds should have won 89. The Cardinals should have won 85. Have the Brewers effectively gained 13 games in the standings? Using last year's stats, Greinke and Marcum (about 55 VORP combined) replace (Davis, Suppan and Bush (-33 VORP combined). Alone, that's 9 wins. With more innings from the new guys, you can also eliminate some of the losses guys like Marco Estrada and Manny Parra provided. With any bounce back from Greinke, the acquisitions could be worth 12 or 13 more games. That puts the Brewers right on top of the Reds. Of course, the margin of error is exceptionally thin for the Brewers. They have no backup players anywhere and no help on the horizon from the minors. This is not the case with the Reds and Cardinals. But, hopefully the Brewers' bullpen additions by subtraction result in enough to overcome some anticipated declines and injuries. It should be really interesting, and it's one last shot for the Brewers to do something we all expected a lot more of when Weeks, Fielder, Braun, Hart, and Gallardo broke through 5 years ago.

Labels: ,

Sunday, December 19, 2010

HOLY SHIT! Brewers land socially anxious, yet talented arm



Despite popular speculation, The Brewers were able to land the 2009 Cy Young Award winner from Kansas City. The Crew sent CF Lorenzo Cain, SS Alcides Escobar, P Jeremy Jeffress, and P Jake Odorizzi to the Royals, who were looking for some strength up the middle. KC also sent light hitting SS Yunieski Betancourt to Milwaukee. Of course, this solidifies the Brewers' rotation while leaving a gaping hole in CF.

Labels:

Thursday, December 02, 2010

Happy Birthday Aaron Rodgers


Yes, Bub, pictures are for winners, Rodgers is clearly that.  

Click here, zoom in and witness Rodgers' swag at his finest as he photobombs multiple on-field pictures.

Labels: ,